Gtx 950 Vs Gtx 1050 Ti

1050 Ti vs 950

Price now 281$

Games supported 84%

Price now 186$

Games supported lxxx%

General info

Comparing of graphics card architecture, market place segment, value for money and other general parameters.

Place in performance rating	235	265
Value for money	xiii.xi	11.45
Compages	Pascal (2016−2021)	Maxwell (2014−2018)
GPU lawmaking name	N17P-G1	GM206
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	25 October 2016 (5 years ago)	20 August 2015 (half dozen years ago)
Launch cost (MSRP)	$139	$159
Current price	$281 (2x MSRP)	$186 (1.2x MSRP)

Value for coin

To get the alphabetize we compare the characteristics of video cards and their relative prices.

Technical specs

Full general performance parameters such every bit number of shaders, GPU core base of operations clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and adding speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, just for precise cess you have to consider their criterion and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	768	768
CUDA cores	768	768
Core clock speed	1290 MHz	1024 MHz
Boost clock speed	1392 MHz	1188 MHz
Number of transistors	3,300 one thousand thousand	2,940 1000000
Manufacturing process technology	xvi nm	28 nm
Thermal design power (TDP)	75 Watt	xc Watt
Maximum GPU temperature	97 °C	no data
Texture make full rate	66.82	49.ii billion/sec
Floating-point performance	2,138 gflops	1,825 gflops

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Data on compatibility with other calculator components. Useful when choosing a future reckoner configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards information technology's interface and double-decker (motherboard compatibility), additional ability connectors (power supply compatibility).

Charabanc support	no data	PCI Express 3.0
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe iii.0 x16
Length	145 mm	seven.938" (20.2 cm)
Height	no data	4.376" (11.ane cm)
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Recommended system ability (PSU)	no data	350 Watt
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x six-pins
SLI options	no information	+

Retention

Parameters of retentivity installed: its blazon, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Annotation that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated VRAM and utilize a shared part of system RAM.

Memory blazon	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	four GB	ii GB
Memory bus width	128 Scrap	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	7 GB/s	6.half-dozen GB/s
Memory bandwidth	112 GB/s	105.6 GB/south
Shared memory	-	-

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise merely for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA fries). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of sure video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort	Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort ane.2
Multi monitor support	no data	four displays
HDMI	+	+
HDCP	no data	+
Maximum VGA resolution	no information	2048x1536
One thousand-SYNC support	+	+
Audio input for HDMI	no information	Internal

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information volition prove useful if you need some item engineering science for your purposes.

GameStream	no information	+
GeForce ShadowPlay	no data	+
GPU Boost	no data	ii.0
GameWorks	no data	+
VR Set	+	no data
Ansel	+	no information

API support

APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	six.4	6.iv
OpenGL	4.6	four.v
OpenCL	ane.2	1.2
Vulkan	one.two.131	1.1.126
CUDA	+	+

Benchmark functioning

Not-gaming benchmark operation comparison. Note that overall benchmark functioning is measured in points in 0-100 range.

Overall score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. Nosotros are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if yous find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems apace.

Passmark
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
3DMark Fire Strike Score
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
GeekBench 5 OpenCL
GeekBench v Vulkan
GeekBench 5 CUDA

This is probably the nigh ubiquitous criterion, function of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics bill of fare a thorough evaluation under various load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the terminal existence done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

3DMark eleven is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark past Futuremark. Information technology used iv tests based on ii scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Criterion coverage: 17%

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 characteristic level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird infinite teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Merely similar Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in Jan 2020 and replaced past 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Fire Strike is a DirectX eleven benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a peppery animal seemingly made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Burn Strike shows off some realistic enough graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from xi dissimilar test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API past Khronos Grouping.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics carte du jour benchmark combined from eleven different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 5%

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card criterion combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

Benchmark coverage: five%

Mining hashrates

Cryptocurrency mining performance of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti and GeForce GTX 950. Usually measured in megahashes per second.

Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	326 Mh/s	233 Mh/s
Decred / DCR (Decred)	1.01 Gh/s	no data
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)	12.62 Mh/s	9.97 Mh/due south
Monero / XMR (CryptoNight)	0.3 kh/s	no information
Zcash / ZEC (Equihash)	156.48 Sol/s	no data

Gaming performance

Let's run into how expert the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Detail gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games beyond dissimilar resolutions:

Full HD	51	52
1440p	31	no information
4K	25	21

Total Hard disk
Low Preset
Full Hd
Medium Preset
Total HD
High Preset
Total HD
Ultra Preset
1440p
High Preset
1440p
Ultra Preset
4K
High Preset
4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

21−24

18−20

Assassinator's Creed Odyssey	48 +167%	18−20 −167%
Assassin'southward Creed Valhalla	21−24 +16.7%	18−20 −xvi.vii%
Battlefield 5	63 +250%	18−20 −250%
Phone call of Duty: Modernistic Warfare	21−24 +xvi.seven%	18−xx −16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 +sixteen.seven%	18−20 −16.7%
Far Cry 5	21−24 +16.seven%	18−20 −xvi.7%
Far Weep New Dawn	48 +167%	18−twenty −167%
Forza Horizon 4	69 +283%	18−20 −283%
Hitman 3	21−24 +xvi.seven%	xviii−20 −16.7%
Horizon Cypher Dawn	21−24 +16.7%	eighteen−20 −16.seven%
Cherry Expressionless Redemption two	35 +94.4%	18−20 −94.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	31 +72.2%	eighteen−20 −72.2%
Picket Dogs: Legion	21−24 +16.7%	xviii−20 −16.seven%

Assassinator'south Creed Odyssey	xl +122%	eighteen−20 −122%
Assassin'due south Creed Valhalla	21−24 +16.seven%	xviii−20 −sixteen.7%
Battlefield 5	52 +189%	eighteen−20 −189%
Call of Duty: Modernistic Warfare	39 +117%	xviii−20 −117%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 +xvi.7%	18−20 −16.seven%
Far Cry 5	21−24 +sixteen.vii%	18−20 −16.7%
Far Cry New Dawn	45 +150%	18−20 −150%
Forza Horizon four	64 +256%	18−xx −256%
Hitman 3	21−24 +16.vii%	18−xx −16.vii%
Horizon Naught Dawn	21−24 +16.seven%	xviii−twenty −16.seven%
Metro Exodus	26 +44.four%	xviii−xx −44.iv%
Reddish Expressionless Redemption two	18 +0%	18−20 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	27 +50%	18−20 −50%
The Witcher three: Wild Hunt	49 +28.9%	38 −28.ix%
Sentry Dogs: Legion	21−24 +xvi.seven%	xviii−20 −16.7%

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24 +33.3%	eighteen−20 −33.3%
Assassinator'due south Creed Valhalla	21−24 +sixteen.7%	eighteen−20 −16.7%
Battleground 5	51 +183%	xviii−20 −183%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 +16.7%	18−20 −16.vii%
Far Cry 5	36 +100%	18−twenty −100%
Far Cry New Dawn	41 +128%	xviii−20 −128%
Forza Horizon 4	45 +150%	18−twenty −150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	26 +23.8%	21 −23.eight%
Watch Dogs: Legion	21−24 +16.7%	18−twenty −16.vii%

Telephone call of Duty: Modernistic Warfare	24 +33.3%	18−20 −33.3%
Hitman 3	21−24 +16.7%	xviii−20 −16.7%
Horizon Nil Dawn	21−24 +sixteen.vii%	18−20 −xvi.7%
Metro Exodus	21−24 +16.seven%	eighteen−20 −16.vii%
Ruby-red Dead Redemption 2	21−24 +sixteen.7%	18−20 −sixteen.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24 +sixteen.7%	18−twenty −xvi.7%

Assassin'south Creed Odyssey	21−24 +16.seven%	18−xx −xvi.7%
Assassinator's Creed Valhalla	21−24 +16.7%	eighteen−20 −xvi.7%
Battlefield 5	36 +100%	18−20 −100%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 +16.7%	18−xx −16.7%
Far Cry 5	21−24 +16.7%	eighteen−20 −sixteen.7%
Far Cry New Dawn	29 +61.1%	18−20 −61.i%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 +xvi.7%	eighteen−20 −xvi.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	21−24 +16.7%	18−xx −16.7%

Phone call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 +16.7%	eighteen−20 −sixteen.7%
Hitman 3	21−24 +sixteen.7%	18−20 −16.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 +16.vii%	18−20 −16.7%
Metro Exodus	nine −100%	18−20 +100%
Red Dead Redemption 2	21−24 +16.7%	18−20 −16.seven%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24 +xvi.vii%	eighteen−20 −xvi.7%
The Witcher three: Wild Hunt	21−24 +61.v%	13 −61.v%

Assassin'south Creed Odyssey	21−24 +16.seven%	eighteen−20 −16.7%
Assassinator's Creed Valhalla	21−24 +xvi.seven%	18−xx −16.vii%
Battleground 5	18 +0%	18−20 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 +xvi.7%	18−20 −xvi.7%
Far Cry 5	21−24 +16.vii%	18−20 −sixteen.7%
Far Weep New Dawn	14 −28.vi%	18−20 +28.6%
Forza Horizon iv	xx +11.1%	18−20 −eleven.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion	21−24 +16.vii%	18−20 −16.7%

Advantages and disadvantages

Functioning rating	21.26	18.16
Novelty	25 October 2016	twenty August 2015
Toll	$139	$159
Memory bandwidth	112	105.6
Chip lithography	xvi nm	28 nm
Thermal design power (TDP)	75 Watt	90 Watt

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical Metropolis recommends

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

since it shows better functioning.

Should y'all still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, enquire them in Comments department, and nosotros shall answer.

Bandage your vote

Do you call back nosotros are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote past clicking "Like" button nigh your favorite graphics card.

Competitors of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti by AMD

We believe that the nearest equivalent to GeForce GTX 1050 Ti from AMD is Radeon R9 380, which is slower by 1% and lower by 1 position in our rating.

Hither are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce GTX 1050 Ti:

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti 100

Competitors of GeForce GTX 950 past AMD

We believe that the nearest equivalent to GeForce GTX 950 from AMD is Radeon HD 7970, which is slower by iii% and lower by 6 positions in our rating.

Here are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce GTX 950:

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 100

Similar GPU comparisons

Nosotros selected several comparisons of graphics cards with functioning more or less close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User rating

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 on a scale of 1 to 5:

Questions and comments

Here yous can ask a question well-nigh this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.

Graphics settings

Screen resolution

FPS

Source: https://technical.city/en/video/GeForce-GTX-1050-Ti-vs-GeForce-GTX-950